UN gangster loses appeals of murder and murder conspiracy convictions

A member of the UN gang who was convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder has lost his appeals for conviction.

Article content

A member of the UN gang has lost his appeals from conviction for murdering a rival gangster and conspiring to murder the Bacon brothers and associates.


Article content

In June 2018, following a lengthy trial, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Janice Dillon found Cory Vallee guilty of the February 2009 first-degree murder of Kevin Leclair and the murder conspiracy which ran from January 2008 to February 2009.

The judge concluded that Vallee was introduced to high-level members of the UN gang by gang leader Clay Roueche and given the role as a hit man in the search to kill the rival Bacon brothers.

She found that the decision to kill Leclair was planned and deliberate and that Vallee used an automatic rifle during the shooting of Leclair in a Langley shopping mall parking lot.

When Leclair returned to his truck in the parking lot from a mall restaurant, two gunmen, one of them Vallee, approached him and opened fire when he attempted to drive away.


Article content

Leclair, who was a former member of the UN gang who had crossed over to the Bacons, was fatally wounded in head.

The trial heard that the murder conspiracy and the shooting of Leclair were part of a lengthy and violent conflict that included many murders and non-fatal shootings and related to a drug turf war between the UN gang on one side and the Bacon brothers and the Red Scorpions gang on the other.

Eventually, the UN gang leadership developed a hit list with bounties attached to members of the rival gangsters. The largest bountie attached to the Bacon brothers, growing from $100,000 to as high as $300,000.

The Crown’s case against Vallee was largely based on the testimony of four former members of the UN gang who were all members of the murder conspiracy. Two of the four men implicated Vallee in the Leclair slaying.


Article content

All four were deemed unsavoury witnesses whose testimony needed to be approached with caution.

One of Vallee’s grounds of appeal was that the trial judge had erred in her analysis of the evidence of the four Crown witnesses.

But in a ruling released Thursday, a three-judge panel of the B.C. Court of Appeal rejected that argument, finding that the judge was “acutely” aware of the risks associated with such witnesses in general and to the witnesses at the Vallee trial in particular, within the framework of the law.

The defence raised several other grounds of appeal including that the judge erred by failing to grant a mistrial as a result of late disclosure by the Crown.

But the three Appeal Court judges — Justice Mary Sanders, Justice Patrice Abrioux and Justice Peter Voith — dismissed those arguments as well and upheld the convictions.


Article content

“CFSEU-B.C. is dedicated to working with IHIT and other law enforcement partners to pursue evidence tied to violent gang-related conflicts regardless of whether that violence happened last week or over a decade ago. Our communities impacted by the violence deserve this commitment, as do the families and loved ones of the victim,” Assistant Commissioner Manny Mann, CFSEU-B.C.’s chief officer, said in a statement

“CFSEU-B.C. will continue to coordinate a collaborative police effort in British Columbia to ensure those involved in criminal organizations and who put lives at risk will be brought before the courts to face justice.”

[email protected]




Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Source link

Leave a Comment